• Homosexuals have a tendency to turn against their parent society if it does not succumb to homosexuality.

By CHARLES KACHIKOTI  –

Humanity
Our basic humanity will evaporate in the heat of gay rights fires should Zambia say ‘yes.’ Signals have started flashing that after gay rights, bestiality (zoophilia), necrophilia (sex with a corpse) and adultery rights will follow.
On February 1, 2013 zoophiles and non-zoophile supporters of zoophile-rights, came out of the shadows and bravely demonstrated right in the heart of Berlin, Germany.
The demonstration was organized by Germany’s zoophile-rights group, Zeta, and was attended by members of  EFA (Equality For All) some of whom took part in a performance piece conceived by Sir Tijn Po especially for this occasion.
The same Sir Tijn Po has directed a new movie The Bestiality Rights Movie which features 50 Czechs, two Germans, one Englishman and animals.
The reason for this demonstration was a vote taking place at the same time in Germany’s Bundesrat that essentially made all cases of zoophilia criminal.
While the demonstration was not successful in stopping this vote, it did spark renewed debate about the most obvious question, namely; why should loving sexual relationships between people and animals be criminalized when endless slaughter and abuse of animals is fully tolerated?
Zeta is still trying to legally fight this new law. Zoophiles are coming out of secrecy and are comparing their struggle for recognition to the gay rights movement’s struggle. As of January this year, a campaign for International Zoophile Rights/Bestiality Rights Day is underway.
In December 2011, the US was caught in a controversy when some senators voted to allow bestiality in the military.
The Family Research Council and CNS News both reported a 93-to-7 US Senate vote to approve a Defence Authorization bill that “includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, but also repeals the military ban on sex with animals, or bestiality.”
Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice bans sodomy with same- or opposite-sex partners as well as bestiality. It states in part: “(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy.… Any person found guilty … shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals  (PETA) wrote President Barack Obama about the matter and was pleased when a conference committee of members of the US House and US Senate restored to a planned military budget bill a ban on bestiality in the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The organisation issued the following statement: “PETA is satisfied that the House and Senate have now understood that they were throwing the baby out with the bath water and that bestiality is a serious matter. We are encouraged because, even if this part of the statute is, for all intents and purposes, dormant, the Department of Defence has given its assurance that anyone committing a sexually abusive act with a member of another species will be prosecuted under a separate section of the act.”
Zoophiliacs, whose misdeeds animal rights groups are defining as cruelty to animals, compare their cause with that of homosexuals. This means that the opening of doors to gays has opened the doors to bestiality and other sexual perversions that are to follow.
Another looming perversion is the legalization of adultery.
In 2005, a group of legislators in South Korea introduced a parliamentary proposal aimed at scrapping the law that prohibits adultery, but legislators have never acted on it, apparently out of concerns of backlash from conservative voters.
In October 2008, South Korea’s Constitutional Court upheld a ban on adultery, rejecting complaints that the 55-year-old law is outdated and constitutes an invasion of privacy. The decision was the fourth since a 1990 ruling upheld a law that makes it a crime to have an extramarital affair. Guilty spouses face up to two years in prison if convicted, though few end up behind bars.
In 2008, women’s rights groups in Taipei, Taiwan, gathered to discuss possibilities of legalizing adultery.
In the US, the legislature of New Hampshire in 2009 started considering repeal of a 200-year-old law that criminalized adultery. The state of California also considered that. In the state of Texas, adultery is a civil offence and not a criminal offence; it attracts no fines and no jail terms. Complications only arise in child custody and disposal of assets and such things.
If you are historically sensitive, such adultery debates are hints at what will follow behind this gay rights debate.
If you can legalise homosexuality, which the American Psychiatry Association until 1973 scientifically considered a mental disorder, you must legalize adultery. If marriages are unfulfilled, men and women must have the right and freedom of association and enjoy adultery.
If you legalize adultery, you must legalise co-habitation. To the list you must add incest, polygamy, bestiality and necrophilia (sex with a corpse). Already the Internet is abuzz with debate on the need to decriminalize necrophilia.
The LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community banner highlights 22 sexual orientations. All sexual abnormalities have been beautified and glorified in this movement.
Any single wrong that is pronounced right must lead to the acceptance of many other wrongs. We cannot accept homosexuality and its rights without opening upon ourselves a torrent of other moral and spiritual abnormalities.
Today men marry men; so do women marry women. Tomorrow men may marry cows and women marry dogs; and adulterers will legally interfere with marriages of others.
In the end we will not be human. Certain nations may be psychologically prepared to graduate from their human-ness into something else. Zambia cannot afford that.
Ethical crisis
Gay marriage if permitted will throw our entire ethical sense into an irredeemable crisis.
When compared to natural heterosexual marriage, gay marriage is not sacred. It has no biblical—or for that matter any other religious—basis for existence as an exclusive and permanent companionship.
The nature of homosexuality is that it does not require loyalty and faithfulness in and outside marriage because there is no moral or spiritual foundation for such commitment.
There is no society or culture anywhere on earth that places a mandatory requirement that homosexual couples be loyal, truthful and faithful to one another for life. No tribe facilitates the initiation of its adolescents into adulthood and also grooms and trains them for responsibilities and obligations of homosexual marriage.
Legal and ethical reality is that only natural heterosexual marriage is sacred. Only normal marriage needs and requires to be legally and spiritually regulated. Only natural marriage is that hallowed because of its procreative importance; the formation and nurture of families.
Natural heterosexual marriages, entered into unlawfully and without the consent of the families of the man and the woman, cannot be fulfilled. This cannot apply to same-sex marriages whose basis is self and disconnection from one’s own descendants, family, society, nation and God.
Same-sex marriage has nothing to do with offspring, progeny, legacy and destiny. It is self-exclusion and self-expulsion from the normal and natural family tree and therefore from the normal ethics of life.
Conjugal reality is that only male and female reproductive organs are sexually compatible. That is not true of homosexual sex. Gay marriage therefore has no basis for existence as an exclusive sexual partnership of lifelong companionship.
Gays are repelled by the opposite gender, but in their same-sex marriages or affairs one of them must pretend to be the opposite gender! This is all about damaged emotions and mentalities.
The universal, time-tested truths on which family and society worldwide have always been founded do not apply to homosexual marriage.
All this does mean that homosexuality, if legalized or decriminalised, would throw Zambia into ethical ambivalence, moral uncertainty and legal ambiguity on all aspects of personal and national life. The entire ethical and legal foundation of our existence would shudder and tumble, leaving us in a vague state of mind typical of people living in thick darkness.
Self-governance
Increased numbers of individuals will lose the ability to govern themselves.
Every government performs its governance tasks in an environment where its subjects are governing themselves well. Sound governance by the ruling class is only possible where the citizens are practicing good self-governance.
As we shall see later, the self-view and world-view of homosexuals is simultaneously hateful, self-pitying and therefore deficient. They are incapable of proper
Are homosexuals possessed by demonic spirits?
In a book published in 1999, two anthropologists, Heike Behrend and Ute Luig stated that men possessed by evil spirits became wives of the spirits while women became husbands of the spirits.
Their book Spirit Possession: Modernity and Power in Africa said from their research in Africa and elsewhere, they had found that: “Male spirits were said to feminize male spirit mediums while emasculating female spirit mediums.”
The anthropologists did not write about homosexuality, but the behaviour of the spirits they researched into has similarities with gay dynamics.
They said that in spirit possession, men are feminised and women become masculine; gender categories are subverted and dislocated; and male leadership or hegemony is denaturalised or placed at a disadvantage. (This applies fully to gays. In many Hollywood productions, fathers are inept and incapable of disciplining their children—that has demonic origins.)
In the Bible, men who are feminised are mentioned. I Corinthians 9:9 and 10 specifically states that fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, the effeminate, homosexuals, thieves, the covetous, drunkards, revilers, swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God.
The effeminate are those men who live feminine lives; transvestites, transgender and those who play the role of woman-figures in homosexual affairs.
One key result of homosexuality, as with all other increasingly tolerated and protected evils, is weak personal principle. People who live for what is inherently wrong, indulging and reveling in it, are easy to divide and rule.
Someone outside is waiting to walk into a morally weak and unprincipled population, and divide and rule Zambia.
Nationhood
Below are the 15 Areas of Nationhood where we stand to lose should we introduce gay rights in Zambia:
In any part of the world, homosexuals hate their country.
In his book The Homosexual Revolution of 1984, David A. Noebel says this: “Homosexuals have a tendency to turn against their parent society if it does not succumb to homosexuality. They will subvert their own nation if they consider it to be too moral or anti-homosexual.”
You will later see under Law and Order that homosexuals will not stop at merely having rights to marry, rights to inheritance and all sorts of things that apply to normal and natural man and woman marriages.
Homosexuals stand for the subversion of their own nation. This was for decades one of the arguments against allowing homos to spell out their sexuality in the US military.
It is not going to be possible to fulfil One Zambia, One Nation ideal in a gay-friendly nation.
The situation becomes direly critical at global level because of the direction in which the United Nations is swaying. A new, self-destructive kind of personhood and nationhood is being purveyed.
Thomas W. Jacobson, M.A., Representative to the United Nations, Focus on the Family, has written the following in an article on 22 Possible So-Called Sexual Orientations:
“‘Sexual orientation’ is a term without clinical or legal definition. No resolution or draft law should be considered by the United Nations or any government unless it contains a clear definition of this term. If the proponents of ‘sexual orientation’ refuse to define the term, know then that their intent is less than forthright, that they are not being honest about its implications and unintended consequences, and that their purpose is not simply to prevent discrimination.
“Heterosexual attraction between males and females is the only natural and normal sexual orientation. There are, however, 21 sexual deviations that may be clinically diagnosed as ‘Paraphilias’ and be popularly labeled as a person’s so-called ‘sexual orientation.’
“If the United Nations declares ‘sexual orientation’ to be an international ‘human right,’ the UN will in effect become a global instrument to normalize paedophilia, bestiality, and 19 other types of sexual behaviour that until recent years were classified as sexual disorders.
“Those who practice homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, sadism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, necrophilia, etc. would have a ‘civil right’ to do so, regardless of the harm to children and other adults. The rest of society would be forced to accept those behaviours as ‘normal’ and whoever opposes will be silenced or chastised.”